How teachers can use the Adult Learning Theory and Principles to help students

Become familiar with Adult Learning Theory and the six principles of adult learning

Adult Learning Theory

Part of being an effective educator involves understanding how adults learn best (Lieb,1991). Andragogy (adult learning) is a theory that holds a set of assumptions about how adults learn. Andragogy emphasises the value of the process of learning. It uses approaches to learning that are problem-based and collaborative rather than didactic, and also emphasises more equality between the teacher and learner.
Andragogy as a study of adult learning originated in Europe in 1950’s and was then pioneered as a theory and model of adult learning from the 1970’s by Malcolm Knowles an American practitioner and theorist of adult education, who defined andragogy as “the art and science of helping adults learn” (Zmeyov 1998; Fidishun 2000).

What do you mean by ‘adult learning principles’?

Knowles identified the six principles of adult learning outlined below.

  • Adults are internally motivated and self-directed
  • Adults bring life experiences and knowledge to learning experiences
  • Adults are goal oriented
  • Adults are relevancy oriented
  • Adults are practical
  • Adult learners like to be respected

How can I use adult learning principles to facilitate student learning on placement

Good question!! Here we will discuss some ways to facilitate learning by applying Knowles’ Adult Learning Principles:

1. Adults are internally motivated and self-directed
Adult learners resist learning when they feel others are imposing information, ideas or actions on them (Fidishun, 2000).
Your role is to facilitate a students’ movement toward more self-directed and responsible learning as well as to foster the student’s internal motivation to learn.
As clinical educator you can :
Set up a graded learning program that moves from more to less structure, from less to more responsibility and from more to less direct supervision, at an appropriate pace that is challenging yet not overloading for the student.
Develop rapport with the student to optimise your approachability and encourage asking of questions and exploration of concepts.
Show interest in the student’s thoughts and opinions. Actively and carefully listen to any questions asked.
Lead the student toward inquiry before supplying them with too many facts.
Provide regular constructive and specific feedback (both positive and negative),
Review goals and acknowledge goal completion
Encourage use of resources such as library, journals, internet and other department resources.
Set projects or tasks for the student that reflect their interests and which they must complete and “tick off” over the course of the placement. For example: to provide an in-service on topic of choice; to present a case-study based on one of their clients; to design a client educational handout; or to lead a client group activity session.
Acknowledge the preferred learning style of the student. A questionnaire is provided below that will assist your student to identify their preferred learning style and to discuss this with you.
2. Adults bring life experiences and knowledge to learning experiences
Adults like to be given opportunity to use their existing foundation of knowledge and experience gained from life experience, and apply it to their new learning experiences. As a clinical educator you can:
Find out about your student – their interests and past experiences (personal, work and study related)
Assist them to draw on those experiences when problem-solving, reflecting and applying clinical reasoning processes.
Facilitate reflective learning opportunities which Fidishun (2000) suggests can also assist the student to examine existing biases or habits based on life experiences and “move them toward a new understanding of information presented” (p4).
3. Adults are goal oriented
Adult students become ready to learn when “they experience a need to learn it in order to cope more satisfyingly with real-life tasks or problems” (Knowles,1980 p 44, as cited in Fidishun, 2000). Your role is to facilitate a student’s readiness for problem-based learning and increase the student’s awareness of the need for the knowledge or skill presented. As educator, you can:
Provide meaningful learning experiences that are clearly linked to personal, client and fieldwork goals as well as assessment and future life goals.
Provide real case-studies (through client contact and reporting) as a basis from which to learn about the theory, OT methods, functional issues implications of relevance.
Ask questions that motivate reflection, inquiry and further research.
4. Adults are relevancy oriented
Adult learners want to know the relevance of what they are learning to what they want to achieve. One way to help students to see the value of their observations and practical experiences throughout their placement, is to:
Ask the student to do some reflection on for example, what they expect to learn prior to the experience, on what they learnt after the experience, and how they might apply what they learnt in the future, or how it will help them to meet their learning goals.
Provide some choice of fieldwork project by providing two or more options, so that learning is more likely to reflect the student’s interests.
“Students really benefit from regular ‘teaching sessions’ – time spent going through assessments such as how to do a kitchen assessment, and having in-services presented on specific topics – such as Cognition or Perception” ” I find they understand more about a topic when it is directly relevant to the work context. This is invaluable as it ties theory to practice.” S. Bartholomai, OT clinical educator, Ipswich Hospital (personal communication, May 31, 2007)
5. Adults are practical
Through practical fieldwork experiences, interacting with real clients and their real life situations, students move from classroom and textbook mode to hands-on problem solving where they can recognise first hand how what they are learning applies to life and the work context. As a clinical educator you can:
Clearly explain your clinical reasoning when making choices about assessments, interventions and when prioritising client’s clinical needs.
Be explicit about how what the student is learning is useful and applicable to the job and client group you are working with.
Promote active participation by allowing students to try things rather than observe. Provide plenty of practice opportunity in assessment, interviewing, and intervention processes with ample repetition in order to promote development of skill, confidence and competence.
“I like to encourage students to select and use a clinical model, such as Chapparo and Rankin’s OPM, to apply to practice. It helps students to identify what performance components (e.g. endurance, tone, organisational skills) they want to assess for example, in a dressing task. This helps to reinforce why OTs do things, and how the link to occupation differs from other disciplines.” (S. Bartholomai, personal communication, May 31, 2007)
6. Adult learners like to be respected
Respect can be demonstrated to your student by:
Taking interest
Acknowledging the wealth of experiences that the student brings to the placement;
Regarding them as a colleague who is equal in life experience
Encouraging expression of ideas, reasoning and feedback at every opportunity.
It is important to keep in mind that the student is still developing occupational therapy clinical practice skills. However, with the theory and principles of adult learning in mind, you can facilitate the learning approach of the student to move from novice to more sophisticated learning methods. This facilitates greater integration of knowledge, information and experience; the student learns to distinguish what is important when assessing and working with clients; how to prioritise client needs, goals and caseload; when rules can be put aside and how/when the approach to occupational therapy practice and professional communication emerges from strict modelling of behaviour into a unique therapeutic and professional expression of self.
(Fidishun, 2000; Lieb,1991)

Want to know more?

Please take a moment to read the Reference Document 3.1: Basic Principles of Adult Learning which the QOTFC (2005) have applied to the role of clinical educator with students in clinical settings.
If you would like to know more about Adult Learning, you can access a very useful and thought-provoking resource called the Self-paced Adult Learning Module for Allied Health Professonals – CDrom (Allen, 2005) from the clinical education administrator, The University of Queensland ph: 07 3365 2792.

Learning Styles

Acknowledge the preferred learning style of your student

We have explored the general principles that apply to how adults learn. Bearing these principles in mind, we can also appreciate that as individuals, we all have different preferences on how we approach new learning. For instance, some people are active learners. They like to be constantly challenged, can think on their feet and enjoy the challenge of being thrown in the deep end, learning best ‘on the job’ through practical exposure, trial and error and direct experience. Other people are more reflective learners, they need time to plan, prepare, research and to have time to reflect on their learning before being confronted with a new challenge. They may like to be thoroughly briefed before proceeding. Some people are theoretical learners, and are stimulated by abstract ideas and concepts. They like to consider numerous viewpoints and theories and to analyse situations before selecting options and approaches to a task. They learn through observation, discussion, analysis, and enjoy logical and sophisticated reasoning. Whilst others are pragmatic learners, they enjoy learning from qualified demonstration, and need to see the practical advantage of all that they are doing. They need to know that what they are doing works and is realistic (Sample, 1999).

Learning styles can be influenced by past experiences, education, work and the learning situation. It is important to recognise that they are not fixed but may be adapted according to context and what is being learned. Nevertheless most people still favour one style of learning.

Very early on, I get [the students] to figure out their learning style by giving them examples and then we negotiate what approach will work best for them.

” J.Copley, OT clinical educator, multiple-mentoring model (personal communication, May 24, 2007)There are various classifications of learning styles that you may like to become more familiar with.

Here are some useful resources and references

The Manual of Learning Styles, by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford (1992).
Provides an introduction to learning styles with advice on how to administer and interpret the The Learning Styles Questionnaire.

Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI): Self-scoring and interpretation booklet. A statistically reliable and valid, 12-item questionnaire and workbook, developed by David A. Kolb (1976).

VARK (Visual, Aural, Read/write, Kinaesthetic). A guide to learning styles by Nick Fleming (1992) Website. http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp

Index of Learning Styles.http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) by (1993). These resources provide useful exercises in helping you and the student to identify preferred learning styles, as well as your preferred approach to teaching. You can then discuss and negotiate with the student learning strategies that will compliment their learning style and your teaching style, as well as the expectations of the placement and the setting.

One of my past students was very ‘hands-on’ ie the activist, and so thoroughly enjoyed being thrown in the deep end and was prepared to make a few mistakes [in order] to learn. I perceived early on that she learnt best through ‘doing’ and not so much from observing or reading“. N. Flynn, OT clinical educator, Mater Private Hospital 2007 (personal communication, June,6,2007).

Then you have the ‘information gatherer’ student, who gathers piles and piles of information, but has difficulty applying this information to practice. It is about enabling that student to turn the ‘pile’ into a program and to use the information to tune their clinical reasoning” K.Adam, OT clinical educator, workplace rehabilitation practice (personal communication, May,10, 2007).

Conflict can occur when the supervisor has an ‘activist’ style to teaching, whilst the student has a ‘theorist’ style to learning” OT clinical educator, PA Hospital (personal communication, May,25, 2007)

Flexibility and adaptability is the key to learning. There may be times when you need to adjust your teaching style to accommodate student needs, as in turn the student will need to accommodate your teaching style and the expectations of the context and situation in which they are learning.

It is important to recognise that you can’t always cater to the learning styles of each student, but you can try to accommodate them as much as is reasonable. For instance, if a student likes demonstration and practice prior to implementing an interview or assessment then, rather than you providing that demonstration all the time, you could encourage them to practice sometimes with the other students first. You can try to meet them in the middle ground” S.Bartholomai, OT clinical educator, Ipswich hospital (personal communication, May 31, 2007)

Difference of Approach

Here is a possible example of two different student learning approaches to delivering a staff in-service and suggestions on how teaching approaches could be modified to accommodate differences in learning style:

Active Learner : May write brief notes to self as prompts and then elaborate more spontaneously through active thinking on spot during in-service. May use immediate verbal and non-verbal feedback to adapt and modify performance behaviour during course of in-service – learning on the spot. May reflect on learning and performance through direct discussion immediately following in-service (with or without note-taking).

Possible teaching approach : Ask student to talk through their plan and rationale prior to action. Direct student to relevant and important resources, information or protocols to ensure attention is given to essential level of preparation. Allow plenty of active hands-on learning and regularly ask student to explain reasoning, background knowledge as it is happening. Encourage immediate reflection and feedback.

Reflective Learner : May make efforts to feel thoroughly prepared, in order to boost confidence and to accept goal as achievable. May prepare for in-service by collecting and reading large amounts of relevant (or sometimes broadly relevant) information relating to topic to gain a comprehensive understanding of the theme; and will prepare for delivery of in-service through memorising, rehearsing information delivery and preparing extensive or detailed notes (may be word for word) for reference during in-service delivery (may or may not be used “in-action”). May have prepared plan B for aspects of in-service discussions, and considered responses to possible questions. Will appreciate time to reflect on performance and outcomes afterwards, and may prefer to take some notes prior to discussing with supervisor.Possible teaching approach : Allow student time to plan, consult and research information relevant to task – within reason. Monitor student’s interpretation of information gathered to ensure that relevance and prioritisation of important information is effectively distinguished from less relevant – assists student to avoid overwhelming themselves with too much information. Encourage time for quiet reflection prior to providing feedback or joint reflection session.
(Sample, 1999)

Key points

Adults have preferred learning styles

  • Know your own style
  • Be aware of other learning styles
  • Acknowledge the preferred learning style of your student

This will assist to

  • Identify areas in need of improvement
  • Design strategies for enhanced learning

(Fitzgerald, 2007, March)

 

 See more at http://www.qotfc.edu.au/resource/index.html

Strengthening America’s Schools Act of 2013

  ASCD  JULY 16, 2013

Student Success Act Advances Toward House Floor

This week, the U.S. House of Representatives is expected to consider legislation that overhauls the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). This marks the first time an NCLB rewrite has reached the full House or Senate floor since the law expired almost six years ago. The House education committee approved the new legislation, the Student Success Act (H.R. 5), on a party-line vote last month.The bill dramatically reduces the federal influence in education, particularly in the areas of school accountability and improvement. Key provisions of the bill include

  • Completely replacing NCLB’s adequate yearly progress (AYP) and school improvement requirements with state-determined accountability systems that annually measure student achievement, assess school performance, and include state-selected interventions for underperforming Title I schools.
  • Swapping NCLB’s highly qualified teacher requirements—which focus on education credentials and teacher licensure status—with locally designed teacher evaluation systems that incorporate student achievement data as one factor of teacher effectiveness and are used to make personnel decisions such as hiring and firing.
  • Providing districts with more flexibility in their use of federal Title I funds by allowing them to prioritize among programs for migrant students, neglected and delinquent students, English language learners, rural students, and American Indian students.
  • Eliminating 70 individual programs, many of which support well-rounded education, such as civics education, Arts in Education, Physical Education Program, and Elementary and Secondary School Counseling.
See the letter (PDF) ASCD sent to the House education committee as it considered the bill.Even with the proposed legislation’s reduced federal footprint, it’s unclear whether the Student Success Act will appease some of the more conservative members of the Republican caucus who have called for the abolishment of the U.S. Department of Education. On the other hand, House Democrats believe the bill’s loosened accountability requirements—particularly its lack of achievement goals for student subgroups—go too far, and they claim the legislation turns back the clock on providing all students with a high-quality and equitable education.

Meanwhile, the Senate education committee approved its own NCLB rewrite (PDF) in June. Senate leaders hope to bring that bill to a vote on the Senate floor this fall.

Don’t miss next week’s Capitol Connection, which will detail the House bill’s progress and implications for educators.

ASCD footer logo 1703 North Beauregard Street, Alexandria, VA 22311
© 2013 ASCD. All Rights Reserved.
Visit our website
www.ascd.org/policy
Contact Us

Vermont’s Landmark College Workshop for College Ready Students at Berkeley!

Five-Day Intensive Workshop at UC Berkeley

Landmark College will offer a week-long Intensive Workshop for Success in College at the University of California Berkeley campus beginning August 5th.

Do your learning differences cause you to struggle with:

  • Recalling information for a test that you spent hours studying for
  • Organizing your thoughts and putting them into a clearly written paper
  • Focusing on reading/retaining what you’ve read
  • Managing your time and materials
  • Starting or finishing a task

If this sounds like you, don’t miss Landmark College’s five-day workshop:

Summer Intensive Workshop for Success in College
(for new & continuing college students who learn differently)
August 5 – 9, 2013 — University of California Berkeley
Cost $1,750

This non-residential* workshop will help you feel better prepared and more confident as you begin or return to college this fall…

Landmark College is the college of choice for students with learning disabilities, ADHD and ASD. In this workshop, our experienced faculty will help you discover:

What science shows us about what we can do to improve our attention, memory and motivation.
Specific strategies and technologies that can support your skills in note-taking, reading, writing, memory and organization as a successful college student.
Application & Brochure

* Single occupancy on-campus housing is available beginning Sunday, August 4th until Friday, August 9th for an additional fee of $550. This fee includes two on-campus meals a day; breakfast and lunch. Housing is available for enrolled students who are 18 years old or older and prepared for an independent living situation.

Questions?
802.387.6718
admissions@landmark.edu

– See more at: http://www.landmark.edu/academics/summer-and-january-programs/non-residental-intensive-programs/#sthash.Soe7HLyM.dpuf

Stop Penalizing Boys for Not Being Able to Sit Still at School

Instead, help them channel their energy into productive tasks.

lahey_schoolboys_post.png

Library of Congress

This year’s end-of-year paper purge in my middle school office revealed a startling pattern in my teaching practices: I discipline boys far more often than I discipline girls. Flipping through the pink and yellow slips–my school’s system for communicating errant behavior to students, advisors, and parents–I found that I gave out nearly twice as many of these warnings to boys than I did to girls, and of the slips I handed out to boys, all but one was for disruptive classroom behavior.

The most frustrating moments I have had this year stemmed from these battles over–and for–my male students’ attention. This spring, as the grass greened up on the soccer fields and the New Hampshire air finally rose above freezing, the boys and I engaged in a pitched battle of wills over their intellectual and emotional engagement in my Latin and English classes, a battle we both lost in the end.

Something is rotten in the state of boys’ education, and I can’t help but suspect that the pattern I have seen in my classroom may have something to do with a collective failure to adequately educate boys. The statistics are grim. According to the book Reaching Boys, Teaching Boys: Strategies That Work and Why, boys are kept back in schools at twice the rate of girls. Boys get expelled from preschool nearly five times more often than girls. Boys are diagnosed with learning disorders and attention problems at nearly four times the rate of girls. They do less homework and get a greater proportion of the low grades. Boys are more likely to drop out of school, and make up only 43 percent of college students. Furthermore, boys are nearly three times as likely as girls to be diagnosed with Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Considering 11 percent of U.S. children–6.4 million in all–have been diagnosed with a ADHD, that’s a lot of boys bouncing around U.S. classrooms.

study released last year in the Journal of Human Resources confirms my suspicions. It seems that behavior plays a significant role in teachers’ grading practices, and consequently, boys receive lower grades from their teachers than testing would have predicted. The authors of this study conclude that teacher bias regarding behavior, rather than academic performance, penalizes boys as early as kindergarten. On average, boys receive lower behavioral assessment scores from teachers, and those scores affect teachers’ overall perceptions of boys’ intelligence and achievement.

While I love teaching boys, many of my colleagues do not, particularly during the hormone-soaked, energetic, and distracted middle- and high-school years. Teachers and school administrators lament that boys are too fidgety, too hyperactive, too disruptive, derailing the educational process for everyone while sabotaging their own intellectual development.

Peek into most American classrooms and you will see desks in rows, teachers pleading with students to stay in their seats and refrain from talking to their neighbors. Marks for good behavior are rewarded to the students who are proficient at sitting still for long periods of time. Many boys do not have this skill.

In an attempt to get at what actually works for boys in education, Dr. Michael Reichert and Dr. Richard Hawley, in partnership with the International Boys’ School Coalition, launched a study called Teaching Boys: A Global Study of Effective Practices, published in 2009. The study looked at boys in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, in schools of varying size, both private and public, that enroll a wide range of boys of disparate races and income levels.

The authors asked teachers and students to “narrate clearly and objectively an instructional activity that is especially, perhaps unusually, effective in heightening boys’ learning.” The responses–2,500 in all–revealed eight categories of instruction that succeeded in teaching boys. The most effective lessons included more than one of these elements:

  • Lessons that result in an end product–a booklet, a catapult, a poem, or a comic strip, for example.
  • Lessons that are structured as competitive games.
  • Lessons requiring motor activity.
  • Lessons requiring boys to assume responsibility for the learning of others.
  • Lessons that require boys to address open questions or unsolved problems.
  • Lessons that require a combination of competition and teamwork.
  • Lessons that focus on independent, personal discovery and realization.
  • Lessons that introduce drama in the form of novelty or surprise.

So what might a great lesson for boys look like? Reaching Boys, Teaching Boysis full of examples, but here’s one I want to try next time I need to help my students review information, particularly a mass of related ideas. Split the class into groups of four and spread them around the room. Each team will need paper and pencils. At the front of the room, place copies of a document including all of the material that has been taught in some sort of graphical form–a spider diagram, for example. Then tell the students that one person from each group may come up to the front of the classroom and look at the document for thirty seconds. When those thirty seconds are up, they return to their group and write down what they remember in an attempt to re-create the original document in its entirety. The students rotate through the process until the group has pieced the original document back together as a team, from memory. These end products may be “graded” by other teams, and as a final exercise, each student can be required to return to his desk and re-create the document on his own.

Rather than penalize the boys’ relatively higher energy and competitive drive, the most effective way to teach boys is to take advantage of that high energy, curiosity, and thirst for competition. While Reichert and Hawley’s research was conducted in all-boys schools, these lessons can be used in all classrooms, with both boys and girls.

Teachers have grown accustomed to the traditional classroom model: orderly classrooms made up of ruler-straight rows of compliant students. It’s neat and predictable. But unless teachers stop to consider whether these traditional methods are working for both girls and boys, we will continue to give boys the short end of the educational stick. According to Reichert and Hawley, ” Doing better by all children includes doing better by boys,” and

Whatever dissonance, confusion, and conflict may hover in the air as stakeholders assert new and competing claims about the nature and needs of boys and girls and the essential or trivial differences between them with respect to how they learn and should be taught, few could reasonably argue with the proposition that many boys are not thriving in school. Nor could one possibly argue there is no room to reason or improve.

Educators should strive to teach all children, both girls and boys by acknowledging, rather than dismissing, their particular and distinctive educational needs. As Richard Melvoin, headmaster at Belmont Hill School in Massachusetts, wrote, “To provide rights and opportunities to girls is important; to call for the diminution of males, to decry their ‘toxicity’ as [Richard Hawley] has put it so poignantly, has not served boys and girls–or men and women–well… May we all find ways of understanding even better this complex ‘piece of work’ called man.”

The Teen Brain: Under Construction

Here’s a common scene in households across the country with teen drivers: A newly minted driver brings home a ticket for running a red light and nonchalantly presents it to his parents, mumbling something like, “I don’t know why I got this.”

“What were you thinking?” asks the incredulous parent. “Why didn’t you use your brain?”

Truth be told, he probably did.

If parents find that hard to grasp, they might find some comfort in knowing that even scientists don’t yet completely understand this complex, dynamic, stupefying organ called the teenage brain. But some answers are emerging.

“Because of massive advances in the ability to study brain function and structure, scientists have begun to see some explanations for the kinds of behavior we see in teenagers,” says Robert D. Foss, director of the University of North Carolina’s Center for the Study of Young Drivers. “The research has given us one irrefutable fact: Teen brains are not yet fully formed. They’re still developing.”

teen-brain-422x250A Look at the Wiring
The human brain develops from back to front, and the last region to be completed is the prefrontal cortex, which handles the important task of decision making. In teens, the areas of the brain responsible for assessing risk and weighing the consequences of one’s actions are still “under construction.” That wiring isn’t fully connected until a person reaches his or her early 20s.

The neurological system that governs impulse control appears to develop most slowly, Foss says, which is one explanation why teens speed or text while driving knowing full well the dangers to a greater degree than other age groups. “I don’t mean to say that we can excuse teenagers for irresponsible behavior,” Foss says. “They must be held accountable. But we can’t blame them or talk them out of this development phase any more than we can talk a 2-year-old out of going through the Terrible Twos.”

Researchers also say that teen brains have trouble managing complex social situations. “Many of the most dangerous driving situations occur when teens are with multiple passengers, when they are out late, or when they are excited or acting out,” says Bruce Simons-Morton, senior investigator and chief of the Prevention Research Branch of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in Maryland.

Therefore, because of their young age and lack of driving experience, teens may be at greater risk of being involved in a crash when they’re faced with added stress or complications—for example, congested traffic, unexpected actions by other road users, or performing secondary tasks (like texting or adjusting an iPod). When adults face similar situations, their brains can usually process them better because adults have more driving experience.

Inattention, due to secondary activities like texting or to distractions like noisy passengers, is a major cause of crashes among teen drivers. On average, teens are better than adults at managing electronic tasks—not surprising for a generation practically born with video game controllers in hand. However, adults are better at dividing their attention between driving and managing electronic tasks, says Simons-Morton.

In one study, Simons-Morton gave cell phones to adults and novice teen drivers and asked them to dial and obtain some particular information while driving on a test track. When they were within about 200 feet of a traffic signal, the light was turned yellow. All of the adults looked up from their task and stopped at the light, but only two-thirds of the teens did so. “Teens may be good at the tasks themselves, but they’re not good at separating them and keeping their eyes on the road,” Simons-Morton says. “Adults have the experience and wisdom to keep looking back at the road.”

Studies show that teens take more risks behind the wheel when they’re with their friends than when they’re driving alone or with a responsible adult. A 16- or 17-year-old driver’s risk of being in a fatal crash increases with each additional passenger, ultimately quadrupling when carrying three or more passengers younger than 21 (and no older passengers), according to research conducted by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. That’s why teen passenger restrictions are an important component of the graduated driver licensing (GDL) process, which allots responsibility to teen drivers in stages as they gain experience behind the wheel.

Managing the Risk
Crash rates per mile driven for teens are nearly four times higher than for adults, according to the AAA Foundation. And teens are 50 percent more likely to crash in the first month of driving than after a year.

Researchers attribute this to teens’ lack of experience, as well as their inability to divide and shift their attention among tasks and stay focused. To address this situation, traffic-safety experts are creating tools to help teens improve in these areas before they actually get behind the wheel.

Posit Science, a San Francisco company that produces brain-training software, is creating InGear, a computer-based program, in partnership with AAA. Currently in development, it features arcade-style video games to help teens practice skills needed to manage the high cognitive demands of driving. For example, in Andromedus X, the user has to track moving objects in the center of their vision while also monitoring potential hazards in their peripheral vision.

As teens play the video games over and over, neural connections in the prefrontal cortex and other memory areas reorganize so that the brain’s responses to the visual and attention demands of driving become more efficient and automatic.

“Our approach helps people train their brains so they can process information faster and maintain focus on the road—and that makes them safer drivers,” says Peter B. Delahunt, Posit Science’s R & D director. For optimal benefit, teens must spend about 10 hours with the program, but Delahunt notes that brain function can be improved with even just a couple hours’ use.

Another tool, Driver-ZED, an interactive DVD produced by the AAA Foundation, takes teen drivers through realistic scenarios—such as dealing with an aggressive tailgater or encountering a child chasing a ball into the street—that help them develop risk-management skills without the pressure of actually being on the road.

In addition to graduated driver licensing, DVDs, and brain-training software, there’s one more important training tool to consider: parents. “Parents have a vast amount of wisdom they’re probably not even aware of,” Foss says. “They need to pass that wisdom on to their teen. They can do this by driving around with their child as much as possible in a variety of circumstances [e.g., driving at night, on freeways, in bad weather]. That’s how their child will learn.”


teen-brains-422x185Under the Hood

These time-lapse MRI images of human brain development between the ages of 5 and 20 (above) demonstrate how our brains change and mature. The brain develops from back to front. The yellow shading shown in the far left image reflect areas—such as those responsible for making judgments and assessing risk—that are still immature in young teens. These sections begin to fill in as adulthood approaches.

As teens get older, the brain reorganizes information and integrates lessons learned (i.e., experience) into memory; the blue and purple shading represent these developments. In the final image, the frontal lobe, which handles executive functions and cognitive processes such as reasoning and planning, finally matures in young adulthood.


5  Ways to Help Your Teen
If teenagers’ brains are not operating at full capacity, no wonder parents fret about them driving a 3,000-pound machine that can go faster than 100 mph.

Parents can do more than worry every time their teen walks out the door with the car keys. By getting involved, they can help their teen understand the risks and responsibilities of driving. “All teens are not necessarily bad drivers,” says Anita Lorz Villagrana, the Auto Club’s traffic safety manager. “They’re just new drivers who lack experience and are dealing with expected physiological changes.” She offers these tips to help get your teen driver off to a safe start.

1. Be a positive role model. Ninety-five percent of parents believe they’re safe drivers, yet 82 percent of teens report seeing their parents drive carelessly. AAA research shows that teen drivers with collisions and citations often have parents with similar driving records.

2. Assess your child’s readiness to drive. Not all teens are mature and responsible enough to start driving at the age they’re allowed to get their permit. “Also assess if both you and your teen are ready to dedicate the time and effort it takes to practice driving skills,” Villagrana says.

3. Make sure your teen is well rested. Teens need about nine hours of sleep every night. Drowsy driving can be as risky as drunk driving; it affects perception, judgment, and reflexes.

4. Know your state’s GDL law. The Parent–Teen Driving Agreement, available at teendriving.aaa.com, reinforces the GDL law and provides guidelines to discuss with your teen. Agreeing in advance in writing to rules, restrictions, and consequences of driving behavior establishes driving as a privilege—not a right—for your teen.

5. Take advantage of teachable moments. When you’re driving and your teen is a passenger, take time to explain what you’re doing and why. For example, you might say, “It’s raining, so I’m braking earlier in case the road is slick.” Such communication can help prevent crashes, injuries, and fatalities.


Kristen A. Nelson is a writer and consultant based in Washington, D.C.


For information on driving laws, the safest cars for teens, insurance for your teen, plus other resources, go to teendriving.aaa.com. Learn about the Auto Club Driving School in the Teen Driving section of our website and via the Driver-ZED website.


Have a comment about this article?

SEND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Offers, prices, event particulars, contact information, and other details mentioned in this article are time sensitive and subject to change without notice. AAA does not endorse the opinions of the magazine’s columnists or reviewers, nor any products, activities, or companies mentioned unless otherwise explicitly stated.

 

The Teen Brain: Under Construction
New research is revealing why teen drivers behave the way they do
By Kristen A. Nelson
Westways  November/December  2012

Opportunities for Educator Involvement in Smarter Balanced Item Development Activities

Recruitment is now underway for qualified educators to participate in the development and analysis of Smarter Balanced pilot and field test items! The California Department of Education (CDE) will be selecting educators for the following activities in 2013:

  • Field Test Item Writing: anticipated dates of service, July–October 2013
  • Field Test Stimulus Review: anticipated dates of service, June–August 2013
  • Field Test Item and Task Review: anticipated dates of service, July–November 2013
  • Pilot Test Data Review: anticipated dates of service, August–September 2013

 

General requirements for participating educators include:

  • Currently certified or licensed to teach English–language arts (ELA) and/or mathematics in a K–12 public school.
  • Currently teaching in a public school or currently employed by a public school or district or state education entity, including higher education.
  • Taught ELA and/or mathematics in grades three through eight and/or high school within the past three years or have worked in a classroom content support role such as a literacy or mathematics coach, district or state content specialist.
  • Previously reviewed part or all of the Common Core State Standards for the content area in which they are interested in writing items.

 

The online application can be found on CDE Web site at http://surveys.cde.ca.gov/surveylogin.asp?k=136882687357. The application deadline is June 6, 2013.

If you have any questions about this recruitment, please contact the CDE Statewide Assessment Transition Office, by phone at 916-445-8517 or by e-mail at sbac@cde.ca.gov.

 

Who Am I?

One question that I often hear asked of young women and men of the high school ages is
“What are you wanting to be when you grow up?”  Many look dumbfounded by this question as little time is spent discovering strengths, gifts, talents, and skills.  How do we enlighten ourselves as to how our brains work as individuals, what are personalities are like, how we are hard-wired, what makes us tick?  We have several resources that may help you lead toward “finding yourself”.  Watch for more resources to be added or updated as you try these inventories out for yourself:

IQ, Personality, Team Tests and Career – Learn more about yourself in order to best choose the career of best fit.

FIND YOUR STRENGTHS:  students find their areas of strengths. Are they Kinesthetic, Linguistic, Logical, Visual, Musical, Intrapersonal with self and/or others. Have students take this 56-question test to learn more about themselves.

FIND YOUR LEARNING STYLE:  students discover their learning modalities with this online inventory and information.

 FIND YOUR BRAIN DOMINANCE: The brain is split into four sections: Upper Left, Lower Left, Upper Right, Lower Right. Which is dominant for you?

FCOE presents winners of Math Counts powered by PIE

Kastner Wins 2013 MathCounts

On February 7th, 2013, the Fresno County Office of Education held its annual MathCounts competition. Co-hosted by the San Joaquin Valley Mathematics Project, the MathCounts competition is open all middle school students in Fresno, Tulare, Madera, Mariposa and Kings Counties.

Students take part in tests for individuals and teams. Tests are both written and oral and include a ‘Jeopardy’ style portion.  This year’s competition was won by Kastner Intermediate in Clovis USD (coached by Vince Oraze). Second place went to Edison Computech.

Passion In Education is the exclusive sponsor of this event.

Get Involved In Creating the New Standardized Testing!

Smarter Balanced Testing and Business Leaders: Preparing Students to Perform in Your Company

Smarter Balanced is a state-led consortium creating new student tests for the 2014-2015 school year and beyond. With nearly two-thirds of all jobs requiring at least some post-high school education, the business community can play a critical role in encouraging the change needed to ensure that students are graduating high school prepared for college and employment. Schools and districts across the country are working now to prepare for the full scale implementation of the new test system. 

What Gets Measured Gets Managed

• Our current testing system in the U.S. is composed mainly of multiple choice questions and rewards our future workforce for basic rote memorization of facts.

• The Consortium is creating a new generation of performance tests that require students to apply knowledge, get things done and demonstrate an ability to solve complex problems.

Preparing Students to Meet Workplace Goals Business leaders need employees who can put skills and knowledge to work to solve problems. Research has proven that when students are required to apply knowledge, their understanding and retention is deepened. To compete in the global market, we must better prepare students to excel professionally and contribute to our economy. Smarter Balanced tests will measure progress toward college and career readiness, providing information for teachers and parents about where students are excelling and where they need more development.

Raising the Bar for our Future Workforce Until recently, each state developed its own education standards and tests. Today, 45 states are implementing updated standards, which define the knowledge and skills students need in order to succeed in college and best perform in your company. Smarter Balanced tests are aligned to these updated standards in English language arts/literacy and mathematics. The tests will be administered online for students in grades 3-8 and 11 to ensure they’re on track to become valuable employees for your company. For the first time, all students will be held to the same high standards and we will have achievement results that will be comparable nationwide.

Get Involved:

• Learn more about the Common Core State Standards: http://www.corestandards.org/.

• Learn more about Smarter Balanced and sign up for a monthly eNewsletter: http://www.smarterbalanced.org/.

• Learn more about California’s implementation of Smarter Balanced: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/sa/smarterbalanced.asp.

• Invite local school leaders to speak at your next chamber meeting about their efforts to help students graduate college- and career-ready.

• Publicly support college- and career-ready standards and assessments in newsletters, letters to the editor and speeches.

Now is the Time to Get Involved There is much work to be done before the full scale implementation of the test system in 2014–2015. By getting involved now, business leaders have the opportunity to work in partnership with schools and districts and shape new policies and practices that are being put into place. smarterbalanced.org acce.org