Category Archives: Advice

Advice for high school students, parents, aspiring college students, and homeschooling.

Five Research-Driven Education Trends At Work in Classrooms

 | October 14, 2013 | 21 Comments

154062807

Getty

 

Increasingly, educators are looking to research about how kids learn to influence teaching practices and tools. What seemed like on-the-fringe experiments, like game-based learning, have turned into real trends, and have gradually made their way into many (though certainly not most) classrooms.

BRAIN-BASED TEACHING

Many educators are using researchers’ insights into how children best learn to inform their teaching practices. Stanford professor Carol Dweck’s research on encouraging children to develop a growth-mindset continues to grow in popularity, as educators try to praise effort, not outcomes. Dweck writes that if children believe their abilities are fixed — that either that they’re smart or they’re not — they approach the world in different ways and aren’t as able to face adversity. When they believe skills and abilities can grow throughout one’s lifetime, they’re better able to rise to challenges.

Brainology, Dweck’s program, is just one of many such school-based programs that teachers can use in classrooms, as is Brainworks.

Educators are also teaching learning strategies, helping students find out the best ways to not just learn content, but how to learn. Ideas like remembering facts when they are set to music. This practice has been employed since the days of oral storytelling, but teachers are reviving it to help students in modern classrooms. Recent studies show that adults learn new languages more easily when they are set to a beat. Some educators are even experimenting with breaking up classical literature into bite sized raps.

There are plenty more examples of brain-based research on learning making its way into classroom practices.

GAME-BASED LEARNING

Games have long been used to engage students. But as game-based learning becomes more prevalent in schools, researchers are interested in how game structure mirrors the learning process. In many games, students explore ideas and try out solutions. When they learn the skills required at one level, they move up. Failure to complete tasks is reframed as part of the path towards learning how to conquer a level.

Universities like HarvardMIT and the University of Wisconsin’s Game and Learning Society are studying how game-playing helps student engagement and achievement, and well-known researchers in the field like James Paul Gee and University of Wisconsin professor Kurt Squireshow are using their own studies to show that games help students learn.

Once the terrain of experimental classrooms, digital games are now becoming more common in classrooms. In a recent survey by the Joan Ganz Cooney Center, half of 505 K-8 teachers said they use digital games with their students two or more days a week, and 18 percent use them daily. Educators are using commercial games like MinecraftWorld of Warcraft and SimCity for education. The Institute of Play continues to study game-based learning and helps support twoQuest to Learn schools, which are based around the idea of games and learning.

POWER OF PERSEVERANCE

Paul Tough’s book, How Children Succeedpopularized the ideas of grit and perseverance. Now those ideas have made their way into a U.S. Department of Education’s Technology office reportas well as the Common Core State Standards, which many states are already implementing. The idea that failure is an opportunity to learn and improve, not a roadblock to achievement, is often referenced as one of the most important life skills a student can take with him beyond the classroom.

Angela Duckworth’s research on grit has shown that often students, who scored lower on intelligence tests, end up doing better in class. They were compensating for their lack of innate intelligence with hard work and that paid off in their GPAs. Duckworth has even developed a “Grit Scale” that allows students to self-report their “grittiness.”

QUESTIONING HOMEWORK

The growing movement against homework in the U.S. challenges the notion that the amount of homework a student is asked to do at home is an indication of rigor, and homework opponents argue that the increasing amount of “busy work” is unnecessarily taking up students’ out-of-school-time. They argue that downtime, free play, and family time are just as important to a child’s social and emotional development as what happens in school.

Some research has shown that too much homework has “little to no impact” on student test scores. Other research on how brains work challenges the common method of asking students to practice one discreet skill at home. Overall, there’s a push to reevaluate the kinds of work students are being asked to do at home and to ask whether it adds value to their learning. If the work is repetitive or tangential, it may add no real value, and teachers across the country are starting to institute no-homework policies. Even principals are starting to revolt and schools are instituting “no homework” nights or substituting “goals” for homework.

CULTIVATING CREATIVITY

Increasingly business leaders and educators are realizing that creativity is a uniquely human quality that will set future graduates apart from the ever smarter computers that are playing increasingly important roles in society. There’s been a focus on stimulating curiosity and creativity through Science Technology Engineering and Math (STEM) courses, including computer coding, as well as integrating art and design into courses. The design thinking movement is a good example of schools working to develop students’ ability to think for themselves, brainstorm ideas and execute them.

Many schools are also shifting towards project-based learning to help leverage student interestsand passions in their school work. Long-form projects often allow students to demonstrate their creativity more than assignments that every student must complete the same way. The trend towards project-based learning is one indication that schools are actively looking to build creativity into curricula.

Partnering with Parents

Gojak_Linda-100x140By NCTM President Linda M. Gojak
NCTM Summing Up, September 5, 2013

Too often when a student struggles with mathematics, a parent comments, “I was never very good at math either.” While that may be true, the need for our students to be successful in mathematics is more urgent than at any time in recent history. In this era of focus on college, career, and life readiness, engaging parents is critical to the success of students from prekindergarten through high school. Although parent involvement is an important part of any student’s academic experience, enlisting parent support in mathematics may present a greater challenge and a more conscientious effort on our part. Studies show that many parents are intimidated by coming into schools and meeting teachers—especially mathematics teachers. Think about how you can work directly with parents so that the school-to-home connection becomes a collaborative experience.

The beginning of the school year offers unique opportunities to connect directly with parents and help them to become engaged in their child’s mathematics education. Students, teachers, and parents are excited, ready, and eager for a new beginning. Whether it is open house, a phone call, or a letter home, contact at the start of school gives parents their first impression of you and of the mathematics their children will be learning.

Consider some possible messages to share with parents.

  • Summarize the big mathematical ideas that the class will be exploring in the coming year. Be sure to put them in family-friendly language. If possible include practical examples to emphasize real-world applications of the concepts—especially in higher-level courses.
  • Inform parents that today’s mathematics content and instruction should look different from the mathematics they had in school. Research and experience demonstrate that high-quality mathematics instruction involves students in making sense of the mathematics they are doing, working together to solve challenging problems, using technology when appropriate, and communicating about their thinking. This explanation will offset any misguided notions that could undermine our work with students.
  • Provide good resources that parents can explore with their children, such as activities on the Illuminations website. Share some good apps that students might use on their tablets or smartphones. If you have a personal Web page for parents to access, include specific websites and apps throughout the year. Consider a “Parent Partners” tab on your home page. Share ideas with other teachers about what to include.
  • At open house, present a traditional mathematics exercise or assignment along with a contrasting activity that promotes deeper understanding. For example, in the elementary grades I have displayed a typical worksheet with 20–25 addition exercises and afterward engage parents in playing a quick round of “Close to 1000.” I ask parents which task they think their child would prefer. The unanimous response has always been “Close to 1000!” Spend some time talking about the mathematics in the activity so that the focus on depth of understanding becomes transparent to parents. Talk about the relevance of games and rich tasks in building mathematical competence.
  • Take time to be reflective about homework you assign to students. Be clear on the purpose of your assignments and the role of parents in supporting their children at home. This is an area of great frustration for many parents. Homework assignments will probably not look like mathematics homework from parents’ school experience. Provide ideas about how they can support their children in doing homework, especially when struggle is likely. In addition to setting aside time and a place to do homework, how should parents respond to students struggling to complete an assignment?
  • Remind parents that their role is not to be the teacher at home. You do not expect them to reteach or explain concepts that may not be totally clear to a student. Whether you suggest a quick call, an e-mail, or a note from the parents when their child has moved beyond productive struggle, the importance of communication cannot be overestimated. When parents do take the time to contact you, be sure to respond in a timely manner.
  • While “Math-for-Parents Night” is a common event in elementary schools, extending these opportunities to middle and high school pushes us to think harder about connecting the mathematics that we are teaching to real-world applications and helping parents to become more comfortable and positive about their children’s mathematics education. It also opens the door for additional communication between the parent and the school.
  • Consider sending home a rich task for families to complete together. It can be related to an event in your school’s community, something that connects mathematics to real life, or simply a task that the family can explore together, is motivational, and gets parents and students working together. An added benefit is developing positive attitudes toward mathematics.
  • Enlist your principal or other administrator in the partnership that you’re establishing with parents. Inform him or her of what is happening in your classroom and suggest ways to support your work and encourage parents to become more involved.

The list above includes some practical starters for developing a constructive relationship between parents and the school. It encourages positive attitudes toward mathematics. Just as we plan daily instruction for our students, a specific yearlong plan to get parents involved and supportive of their children will positively influence our work and can only lead to increased student success. Fall is an exciting time of the year for teachers, students, and parents. Have the best school year ever!

Page Feedback

Your feedback is important! Comments or concerns regarding the content of this page may be sent to nctm@nctm.org. Thank you.

 

– See more at: http://www.nctm.org/about/content.aspx?id=39367#sthash.qwo6sV3z.dpuf

Myers-Briggs Training in Visalia, California!

Relationship 911

Myers-Briggs® Personality Workshop

Introduces Lori Quinzon – Certified Life Coach

STRUGGLES WITH OTHERS AT WORK OR LEISURE?

Why do you do that?

Have you ever wondered why other people don’t do things the way you do?

People are created with a unique personality.  Understand how you and those around you are wired.  The Myers-Briggs® Assessment creates a common language for understanding strengths, weaknesses and differences. This workshop will provide you with tools to build bridges in your relationships.

Training is designed to benefit individuals, partners, leaders, and teams.

 

Fresno Pacific University – Visalia Center

FRIDAY – December 6, 2013

9:00 AM – 4:30 PM

Cost: $125 per person including materials (50% off corporate training prices!)

 

One-hour lunch break on your own so you have time to discuss.

For more information or to sign-up, email:  llsq@juno.com

Or call:  559-901-7157

 

Join us for a day of discovery and fun!               

Invite Parents Into The Classroom!

September 21, 2013

Common-Core Messaging 101: Come See My Classroom


Jessica Cuthbertson

I used to believe that my workspace was a classroom. I used to believe that my job was to teach English/language arts. And I used to believe that my primary responsibility was to teach—period.

While on the surface all of these statements are technically true, I no longer hold these beliefs.

Instead, I believe I work in a learning laboratory, not a classroom. I believe I teach human beings, not English/language arts. I believe my primary responsibility isn’t to teach; it is to learn and facilitate the learning of others.

For some, this may seem like semantics. But for me, these beliefs drive everything I do. Experience, reflection, and implementing the Common Core State Standards have changed the landscape of teaching and learning for me.

When it comes to core beliefs, semantics matter.

And when it comes to the common core, what teachers say and believe matters to others as well. Do I believe we have a responsibility to inform parents about teaching and learning in the common core era? Absolutely. But beyond this, I believe we have a greater obligation to open our doors wider than ever and let them see for themselves. I believe we need fewer classrooms and more learning laboratories. I believe it is our role to be ambassadors for student learning, showcasing what the standards look like in action.

It’s fascinating to see what adolescent readers can do when supported with close-reading strategies. It’s far more interesting to read a writer’s argument, informed by research and critical analysis, than it is to read a formulaic or decontextualized piece of writing. And it’s hard to envision what “text complexity” looks like without listening in or participating in a discussion about a complex text.

When you confront the mythologies about the standards and strip away all of the political rhetoric, you are left with a document. A set of high, clear, vertically aligned expectations that outline what all students should know and be able to do to become college and career ready.

The standards are not a secret, so we shouldn’t keep them from parents. In fact, we should be clear about what they are and even clearer about what they are not. They are not a curriculum or a federal edict. They are not an invasion of privacy, a usurping of local control, or a corporate takeover of K-12 education.

While all of these claims may make for sensational headlines, the student learning results speak for themselves. But it is up to us to show, share, and speak about what the standards mean for students. The implementation of the common core has significantly improved the teaching and learning in Room 214 and in my colleagues’ classrooms across the nation.

But don’t take my word for it. Come see for yourself.

Jessica Cuthbertson, a Colorado educator with 10 years’ experience, teaches middle school literacy and has served as a literacy instructional coach for Aurora Public Schools.

Posted by Jessica Cuthbertson at 10:21 AM | Permalink | 11 Comments | 2 Recommendations

Great Expectations is what Parents Should Hear!

September 23, 2013

Great Expectations: What I’ll Tell Parents About the Common Core


Ilana Garon

I first learned about Common Core State Standards at a professional-development seminar in the summer of 2010. At the time, the standards seemed relatively innocuous—yet another of the top-down mandates, I figured, that would be embraced momentarily as the “silver bullet” for myriad education problems before being thrown aside for the next big thing. I enjoyed the seminar, not because I thought the common core itself was so life-changing, but because I loved having the opportunity to collaborate meaningfully with my colleagues at other schools and share best practices.

Some three years later, the common standards factor into everything I do in the classroom—every single unit plan I create, and every single lesson therein, is designed to contain tasks that align with the standards. Do my assignments ask kids to cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis (RL 9-10.1)? Sure they do. Will my students analyze a theme as presented by two different artistic mediums (RL 9-10.7)? You bet they will. Will they be analyzing how an author draws on source materials like the Bible in a later work (RL 9-10.9)? Yup—within the next three weeks. They’re reading Lord of the Flies, and we’ll be discussing how the island is like the Garden of Eden, how Simon is the Christ-figure, and how the titular Lord of the Flies is another name for . . . well, I’ll let you figure that one out.

In my experience, the parents of our students have limited familiarity with the standards, taking it as a given that the curricula we teach our students contain the things they need to know. They’re less concerned with the specifics than with graduation requirements being met. In truth, the few who do know about the common core may be laboring under the same misconception that I was during the summer seminar: That the common core was merely a framework by which I could design more rigorous lessons, rather than a set of expectations about what students would already know and would be able to do in a certain grade—expectations upon which subsequent standardized tests would be based.

At the high school level, this has taken a while to materialize; the past couple of years, my students have still been cowering in the face of the New York state Regents examinations. This year, in addition to Regents, a new set of “assessments” is materializing based on the common core. As is the typical M.O. of the common core (wherein apparently a one-week seminar is expected to be sufficient preparation for a complete overhaul of one’s entire teaching style and body of materials), teachers haven’t even seen the format of this exam. Hey, on the bright side, at least we won’t be teaching to the test!

The thing about the common standards is that they are optimistic at best. However capable my students may be of making those types of connections and intellectual leaps under the guidance of a teacher, they are—for the most part—unable to do so on their own without significant scaffolding. And the test, presumably, will require them to do just that. In a more general sense, the common core operate under the premise that the kids have background knowledge and literary experience that they simply don’t. While I do not dismiss the goals of the common standards, and am happy to continue working with the students towards deeper comprehension, a broader knowledge base, and more lucid writing, to take for granted that all students will possess these same skills is naïve.

In the public schools, particularly, we work with students who are often several grades behind where the standards prescribe them to be due to interrupted formal education or language barriers; we also work with special-needs students, whose strengths and weaknesses are diverse. One mainstay of good pedagogy is “differentiation,” the act of tailoring lessons to individual students, or groups of students, in ways that address their individual needs and offer them challenges at their respective levels. The implementation of the common core as a set of intellectual requirements for students, as opposed to an instructional lodestar for teachers (as I’d initially understood them), seems to fly in the face of that—and to the extent that they inform standardized testing, even more so.

So what will I tell the parents of our students, should they ask me about the common core at parent-teacher night in October? I’m unsure. I certainly cannot imagine our parents exerting overthostility towards the standards—I think confusion and concern about how this will affect their children’s chances of graduation are more likely. And if that is the case, I’ll tell them to continue monitoring their child, and keep in touch with me—the same as I always do.

Ilana Garon is an English teacher at a high school in the Bronx, N.Y.  She recently published her first book, ‘Why Do Only White People Get Abducted by Aliens?’: Teaching Lessons From the Bronx.

 

Posted by Ilana Garon at 12:18 AM | Permalink | 6 Comments | 1 Recommendation

How teachers can use the Adult Learning Theory and Principles to help students

Become familiar with Adult Learning Theory and the six principles of adult learning

Adult Learning Theory

Part of being an effective educator involves understanding how adults learn best (Lieb,1991). Andragogy (adult learning) is a theory that holds a set of assumptions about how adults learn. Andragogy emphasises the value of the process of learning. It uses approaches to learning that are problem-based and collaborative rather than didactic, and also emphasises more equality between the teacher and learner.
Andragogy as a study of adult learning originated in Europe in 1950’s and was then pioneered as a theory and model of adult learning from the 1970’s by Malcolm Knowles an American practitioner and theorist of adult education, who defined andragogy as “the art and science of helping adults learn” (Zmeyov 1998; Fidishun 2000).

What do you mean by ‘adult learning principles’?

Knowles identified the six principles of adult learning outlined below.

  • Adults are internally motivated and self-directed
  • Adults bring life experiences and knowledge to learning experiences
  • Adults are goal oriented
  • Adults are relevancy oriented
  • Adults are practical
  • Adult learners like to be respected

How can I use adult learning principles to facilitate student learning on placement

Good question!! Here we will discuss some ways to facilitate learning by applying Knowles’ Adult Learning Principles:

1. Adults are internally motivated and self-directed
Adult learners resist learning when they feel others are imposing information, ideas or actions on them (Fidishun, 2000).
Your role is to facilitate a students’ movement toward more self-directed and responsible learning as well as to foster the student’s internal motivation to learn.
As clinical educator you can :
Set up a graded learning program that moves from more to less structure, from less to more responsibility and from more to less direct supervision, at an appropriate pace that is challenging yet not overloading for the student.
Develop rapport with the student to optimise your approachability and encourage asking of questions and exploration of concepts.
Show interest in the student’s thoughts and opinions. Actively and carefully listen to any questions asked.
Lead the student toward inquiry before supplying them with too many facts.
Provide regular constructive and specific feedback (both positive and negative),
Review goals and acknowledge goal completion
Encourage use of resources such as library, journals, internet and other department resources.
Set projects or tasks for the student that reflect their interests and which they must complete and “tick off” over the course of the placement. For example: to provide an in-service on topic of choice; to present a case-study based on one of their clients; to design a client educational handout; or to lead a client group activity session.
Acknowledge the preferred learning style of the student. A questionnaire is provided below that will assist your student to identify their preferred learning style and to discuss this with you.
2. Adults bring life experiences and knowledge to learning experiences
Adults like to be given opportunity to use their existing foundation of knowledge and experience gained from life experience, and apply it to their new learning experiences. As a clinical educator you can:
Find out about your student – their interests and past experiences (personal, work and study related)
Assist them to draw on those experiences when problem-solving, reflecting and applying clinical reasoning processes.
Facilitate reflective learning opportunities which Fidishun (2000) suggests can also assist the student to examine existing biases or habits based on life experiences and “move them toward a new understanding of information presented” (p4).
3. Adults are goal oriented
Adult students become ready to learn when “they experience a need to learn it in order to cope more satisfyingly with real-life tasks or problems” (Knowles,1980 p 44, as cited in Fidishun, 2000). Your role is to facilitate a student’s readiness for problem-based learning and increase the student’s awareness of the need for the knowledge or skill presented. As educator, you can:
Provide meaningful learning experiences that are clearly linked to personal, client and fieldwork goals as well as assessment and future life goals.
Provide real case-studies (through client contact and reporting) as a basis from which to learn about the theory, OT methods, functional issues implications of relevance.
Ask questions that motivate reflection, inquiry and further research.
4. Adults are relevancy oriented
Adult learners want to know the relevance of what they are learning to what they want to achieve. One way to help students to see the value of their observations and practical experiences throughout their placement, is to:
Ask the student to do some reflection on for example, what they expect to learn prior to the experience, on what they learnt after the experience, and how they might apply what they learnt in the future, or how it will help them to meet their learning goals.
Provide some choice of fieldwork project by providing two or more options, so that learning is more likely to reflect the student’s interests.
“Students really benefit from regular ‘teaching sessions’ – time spent going through assessments such as how to do a kitchen assessment, and having in-services presented on specific topics – such as Cognition or Perception” ” I find they understand more about a topic when it is directly relevant to the work context. This is invaluable as it ties theory to practice.” S. Bartholomai, OT clinical educator, Ipswich Hospital (personal communication, May 31, 2007)
5. Adults are practical
Through practical fieldwork experiences, interacting with real clients and their real life situations, students move from classroom and textbook mode to hands-on problem solving where they can recognise first hand how what they are learning applies to life and the work context. As a clinical educator you can:
Clearly explain your clinical reasoning when making choices about assessments, interventions and when prioritising client’s clinical needs.
Be explicit about how what the student is learning is useful and applicable to the job and client group you are working with.
Promote active participation by allowing students to try things rather than observe. Provide plenty of practice opportunity in assessment, interviewing, and intervention processes with ample repetition in order to promote development of skill, confidence and competence.
“I like to encourage students to select and use a clinical model, such as Chapparo and Rankin’s OPM, to apply to practice. It helps students to identify what performance components (e.g. endurance, tone, organisational skills) they want to assess for example, in a dressing task. This helps to reinforce why OTs do things, and how the link to occupation differs from other disciplines.” (S. Bartholomai, personal communication, May 31, 2007)
6. Adult learners like to be respected
Respect can be demonstrated to your student by:
Taking interest
Acknowledging the wealth of experiences that the student brings to the placement;
Regarding them as a colleague who is equal in life experience
Encouraging expression of ideas, reasoning and feedback at every opportunity.
It is important to keep in mind that the student is still developing occupational therapy clinical practice skills. However, with the theory and principles of adult learning in mind, you can facilitate the learning approach of the student to move from novice to more sophisticated learning methods. This facilitates greater integration of knowledge, information and experience; the student learns to distinguish what is important when assessing and working with clients; how to prioritise client needs, goals and caseload; when rules can be put aside and how/when the approach to occupational therapy practice and professional communication emerges from strict modelling of behaviour into a unique therapeutic and professional expression of self.
(Fidishun, 2000; Lieb,1991)

Want to know more?

Please take a moment to read the Reference Document 3.1: Basic Principles of Adult Learning which the QOTFC (2005) have applied to the role of clinical educator with students in clinical settings.
If you would like to know more about Adult Learning, you can access a very useful and thought-provoking resource called the Self-paced Adult Learning Module for Allied Health Professonals – CDrom (Allen, 2005) from the clinical education administrator, The University of Queensland ph: 07 3365 2792.

Learning Styles

Acknowledge the preferred learning style of your student

We have explored the general principles that apply to how adults learn. Bearing these principles in mind, we can also appreciate that as individuals, we all have different preferences on how we approach new learning. For instance, some people are active learners. They like to be constantly challenged, can think on their feet and enjoy the challenge of being thrown in the deep end, learning best ‘on the job’ through practical exposure, trial and error and direct experience. Other people are more reflective learners, they need time to plan, prepare, research and to have time to reflect on their learning before being confronted with a new challenge. They may like to be thoroughly briefed before proceeding. Some people are theoretical learners, and are stimulated by abstract ideas and concepts. They like to consider numerous viewpoints and theories and to analyse situations before selecting options and approaches to a task. They learn through observation, discussion, analysis, and enjoy logical and sophisticated reasoning. Whilst others are pragmatic learners, they enjoy learning from qualified demonstration, and need to see the practical advantage of all that they are doing. They need to know that what they are doing works and is realistic (Sample, 1999).

Learning styles can be influenced by past experiences, education, work and the learning situation. It is important to recognise that they are not fixed but may be adapted according to context and what is being learned. Nevertheless most people still favour one style of learning.

Very early on, I get [the students] to figure out their learning style by giving them examples and then we negotiate what approach will work best for them.

” J.Copley, OT clinical educator, multiple-mentoring model (personal communication, May 24, 2007)There are various classifications of learning styles that you may like to become more familiar with.

Here are some useful resources and references

The Manual of Learning Styles, by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford (1992).
Provides an introduction to learning styles with advice on how to administer and interpret the The Learning Styles Questionnaire.

Kolb Learning Style Inventory (LSI): Self-scoring and interpretation booklet. A statistically reliable and valid, 12-item questionnaire and workbook, developed by David A. Kolb (1976).

VARK (Visual, Aural, Read/write, Kinaesthetic). A guide to learning styles by Nick Fleming (1992) Website. http://www.vark-learn.com/english/index.asp

Index of Learning Styles.http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) by (1993). These resources provide useful exercises in helping you and the student to identify preferred learning styles, as well as your preferred approach to teaching. You can then discuss and negotiate with the student learning strategies that will compliment their learning style and your teaching style, as well as the expectations of the placement and the setting.

One of my past students was very ‘hands-on’ ie the activist, and so thoroughly enjoyed being thrown in the deep end and was prepared to make a few mistakes [in order] to learn. I perceived early on that she learnt best through ‘doing’ and not so much from observing or reading“. N. Flynn, OT clinical educator, Mater Private Hospital 2007 (personal communication, June,6,2007).

Then you have the ‘information gatherer’ student, who gathers piles and piles of information, but has difficulty applying this information to practice. It is about enabling that student to turn the ‘pile’ into a program and to use the information to tune their clinical reasoning” K.Adam, OT clinical educator, workplace rehabilitation practice (personal communication, May,10, 2007).

Conflict can occur when the supervisor has an ‘activist’ style to teaching, whilst the student has a ‘theorist’ style to learning” OT clinical educator, PA Hospital (personal communication, May,25, 2007)

Flexibility and adaptability is the key to learning. There may be times when you need to adjust your teaching style to accommodate student needs, as in turn the student will need to accommodate your teaching style and the expectations of the context and situation in which they are learning.

It is important to recognise that you can’t always cater to the learning styles of each student, but you can try to accommodate them as much as is reasonable. For instance, if a student likes demonstration and practice prior to implementing an interview or assessment then, rather than you providing that demonstration all the time, you could encourage them to practice sometimes with the other students first. You can try to meet them in the middle ground” S.Bartholomai, OT clinical educator, Ipswich hospital (personal communication, May 31, 2007)

Difference of Approach

Here is a possible example of two different student learning approaches to delivering a staff in-service and suggestions on how teaching approaches could be modified to accommodate differences in learning style:

Active Learner : May write brief notes to self as prompts and then elaborate more spontaneously through active thinking on spot during in-service. May use immediate verbal and non-verbal feedback to adapt and modify performance behaviour during course of in-service – learning on the spot. May reflect on learning and performance through direct discussion immediately following in-service (with or without note-taking).

Possible teaching approach : Ask student to talk through their plan and rationale prior to action. Direct student to relevant and important resources, information or protocols to ensure attention is given to essential level of preparation. Allow plenty of active hands-on learning and regularly ask student to explain reasoning, background knowledge as it is happening. Encourage immediate reflection and feedback.

Reflective Learner : May make efforts to feel thoroughly prepared, in order to boost confidence and to accept goal as achievable. May prepare for in-service by collecting and reading large amounts of relevant (or sometimes broadly relevant) information relating to topic to gain a comprehensive understanding of the theme; and will prepare for delivery of in-service through memorising, rehearsing information delivery and preparing extensive or detailed notes (may be word for word) for reference during in-service delivery (may or may not be used “in-action”). May have prepared plan B for aspects of in-service discussions, and considered responses to possible questions. Will appreciate time to reflect on performance and outcomes afterwards, and may prefer to take some notes prior to discussing with supervisor.Possible teaching approach : Allow student time to plan, consult and research information relevant to task – within reason. Monitor student’s interpretation of information gathered to ensure that relevance and prioritisation of important information is effectively distinguished from less relevant – assists student to avoid overwhelming themselves with too much information. Encourage time for quiet reflection prior to providing feedback or joint reflection session.
(Sample, 1999)

Key points

Adults have preferred learning styles

  • Know your own style
  • Be aware of other learning styles
  • Acknowledge the preferred learning style of your student

This will assist to

  • Identify areas in need of improvement
  • Design strategies for enhanced learning

(Fitzgerald, 2007, March)

 

 See more at http://www.qotfc.edu.au/resource/index.html

Vermont’s Landmark College Workshop for College Ready Students at Berkeley!

Five-Day Intensive Workshop at UC Berkeley

Landmark College will offer a week-long Intensive Workshop for Success in College at the University of California Berkeley campus beginning August 5th.

Do your learning differences cause you to struggle with:

  • Recalling information for a test that you spent hours studying for
  • Organizing your thoughts and putting them into a clearly written paper
  • Focusing on reading/retaining what you’ve read
  • Managing your time and materials
  • Starting or finishing a task

If this sounds like you, don’t miss Landmark College’s five-day workshop:

Summer Intensive Workshop for Success in College
(for new & continuing college students who learn differently)
August 5 – 9, 2013 — University of California Berkeley
Cost $1,750

This non-residential* workshop will help you feel better prepared and more confident as you begin or return to college this fall…

Landmark College is the college of choice for students with learning disabilities, ADHD and ASD. In this workshop, our experienced faculty will help you discover:

What science shows us about what we can do to improve our attention, memory and motivation.
Specific strategies and technologies that can support your skills in note-taking, reading, writing, memory and organization as a successful college student.
Application & Brochure

* Single occupancy on-campus housing is available beginning Sunday, August 4th until Friday, August 9th for an additional fee of $550. This fee includes two on-campus meals a day; breakfast and lunch. Housing is available for enrolled students who are 18 years old or older and prepared for an independent living situation.

Questions?
802.387.6718
admissions@landmark.edu

– See more at: http://www.landmark.edu/academics/summer-and-january-programs/non-residental-intensive-programs/#sthash.Soe7HLyM.dpuf

Stop Penalizing Boys for Not Being Able to Sit Still at School

Instead, help them channel their energy into productive tasks.

lahey_schoolboys_post.png

Library of Congress

This year’s end-of-year paper purge in my middle school office revealed a startling pattern in my teaching practices: I discipline boys far more often than I discipline girls. Flipping through the pink and yellow slips–my school’s system for communicating errant behavior to students, advisors, and parents–I found that I gave out nearly twice as many of these warnings to boys than I did to girls, and of the slips I handed out to boys, all but one was for disruptive classroom behavior.

The most frustrating moments I have had this year stemmed from these battles over–and for–my male students’ attention. This spring, as the grass greened up on the soccer fields and the New Hampshire air finally rose above freezing, the boys and I engaged in a pitched battle of wills over their intellectual and emotional engagement in my Latin and English classes, a battle we both lost in the end.

Something is rotten in the state of boys’ education, and I can’t help but suspect that the pattern I have seen in my classroom may have something to do with a collective failure to adequately educate boys. The statistics are grim. According to the book Reaching Boys, Teaching Boys: Strategies That Work and Why, boys are kept back in schools at twice the rate of girls. Boys get expelled from preschool nearly five times more often than girls. Boys are diagnosed with learning disorders and attention problems at nearly four times the rate of girls. They do less homework and get a greater proportion of the low grades. Boys are more likely to drop out of school, and make up only 43 percent of college students. Furthermore, boys are nearly three times as likely as girls to be diagnosed with Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Considering 11 percent of U.S. children–6.4 million in all–have been diagnosed with a ADHD, that’s a lot of boys bouncing around U.S. classrooms.

study released last year in the Journal of Human Resources confirms my suspicions. It seems that behavior plays a significant role in teachers’ grading practices, and consequently, boys receive lower grades from their teachers than testing would have predicted. The authors of this study conclude that teacher bias regarding behavior, rather than academic performance, penalizes boys as early as kindergarten. On average, boys receive lower behavioral assessment scores from teachers, and those scores affect teachers’ overall perceptions of boys’ intelligence and achievement.

While I love teaching boys, many of my colleagues do not, particularly during the hormone-soaked, energetic, and distracted middle- and high-school years. Teachers and school administrators lament that boys are too fidgety, too hyperactive, too disruptive, derailing the educational process for everyone while sabotaging their own intellectual development.

Peek into most American classrooms and you will see desks in rows, teachers pleading with students to stay in their seats and refrain from talking to their neighbors. Marks for good behavior are rewarded to the students who are proficient at sitting still for long periods of time. Many boys do not have this skill.

In an attempt to get at what actually works for boys in education, Dr. Michael Reichert and Dr. Richard Hawley, in partnership with the International Boys’ School Coalition, launched a study called Teaching Boys: A Global Study of Effective Practices, published in 2009. The study looked at boys in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, in schools of varying size, both private and public, that enroll a wide range of boys of disparate races and income levels.

The authors asked teachers and students to “narrate clearly and objectively an instructional activity that is especially, perhaps unusually, effective in heightening boys’ learning.” The responses–2,500 in all–revealed eight categories of instruction that succeeded in teaching boys. The most effective lessons included more than one of these elements:

  • Lessons that result in an end product–a booklet, a catapult, a poem, or a comic strip, for example.
  • Lessons that are structured as competitive games.
  • Lessons requiring motor activity.
  • Lessons requiring boys to assume responsibility for the learning of others.
  • Lessons that require boys to address open questions or unsolved problems.
  • Lessons that require a combination of competition and teamwork.
  • Lessons that focus on independent, personal discovery and realization.
  • Lessons that introduce drama in the form of novelty or surprise.

So what might a great lesson for boys look like? Reaching Boys, Teaching Boysis full of examples, but here’s one I want to try next time I need to help my students review information, particularly a mass of related ideas. Split the class into groups of four and spread them around the room. Each team will need paper and pencils. At the front of the room, place copies of a document including all of the material that has been taught in some sort of graphical form–a spider diagram, for example. Then tell the students that one person from each group may come up to the front of the classroom and look at the document for thirty seconds. When those thirty seconds are up, they return to their group and write down what they remember in an attempt to re-create the original document in its entirety. The students rotate through the process until the group has pieced the original document back together as a team, from memory. These end products may be “graded” by other teams, and as a final exercise, each student can be required to return to his desk and re-create the document on his own.

Rather than penalize the boys’ relatively higher energy and competitive drive, the most effective way to teach boys is to take advantage of that high energy, curiosity, and thirst for competition. While Reichert and Hawley’s research was conducted in all-boys schools, these lessons can be used in all classrooms, with both boys and girls.

Teachers have grown accustomed to the traditional classroom model: orderly classrooms made up of ruler-straight rows of compliant students. It’s neat and predictable. But unless teachers stop to consider whether these traditional methods are working for both girls and boys, we will continue to give boys the short end of the educational stick. According to Reichert and Hawley, ” Doing better by all children includes doing better by boys,” and

Whatever dissonance, confusion, and conflict may hover in the air as stakeholders assert new and competing claims about the nature and needs of boys and girls and the essential or trivial differences between them with respect to how they learn and should be taught, few could reasonably argue with the proposition that many boys are not thriving in school. Nor could one possibly argue there is no room to reason or improve.

Educators should strive to teach all children, both girls and boys by acknowledging, rather than dismissing, their particular and distinctive educational needs. As Richard Melvoin, headmaster at Belmont Hill School in Massachusetts, wrote, “To provide rights and opportunities to girls is important; to call for the diminution of males, to decry their ‘toxicity’ as [Richard Hawley] has put it so poignantly, has not served boys and girls–or men and women–well… May we all find ways of understanding even better this complex ‘piece of work’ called man.”

The Teen Brain: Under Construction

Here’s a common scene in households across the country with teen drivers: A newly minted driver brings home a ticket for running a red light and nonchalantly presents it to his parents, mumbling something like, “I don’t know why I got this.”

“What were you thinking?” asks the incredulous parent. “Why didn’t you use your brain?”

Truth be told, he probably did.

If parents find that hard to grasp, they might find some comfort in knowing that even scientists don’t yet completely understand this complex, dynamic, stupefying organ called the teenage brain. But some answers are emerging.

“Because of massive advances in the ability to study brain function and structure, scientists have begun to see some explanations for the kinds of behavior we see in teenagers,” says Robert D. Foss, director of the University of North Carolina’s Center for the Study of Young Drivers. “The research has given us one irrefutable fact: Teen brains are not yet fully formed. They’re still developing.”

teen-brain-422x250A Look at the Wiring
The human brain develops from back to front, and the last region to be completed is the prefrontal cortex, which handles the important task of decision making. In teens, the areas of the brain responsible for assessing risk and weighing the consequences of one’s actions are still “under construction.” That wiring isn’t fully connected until a person reaches his or her early 20s.

The neurological system that governs impulse control appears to develop most slowly, Foss says, which is one explanation why teens speed or text while driving knowing full well the dangers to a greater degree than other age groups. “I don’t mean to say that we can excuse teenagers for irresponsible behavior,” Foss says. “They must be held accountable. But we can’t blame them or talk them out of this development phase any more than we can talk a 2-year-old out of going through the Terrible Twos.”

Researchers also say that teen brains have trouble managing complex social situations. “Many of the most dangerous driving situations occur when teens are with multiple passengers, when they are out late, or when they are excited or acting out,” says Bruce Simons-Morton, senior investigator and chief of the Prevention Research Branch of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development in Maryland.

Therefore, because of their young age and lack of driving experience, teens may be at greater risk of being involved in a crash when they’re faced with added stress or complications—for example, congested traffic, unexpected actions by other road users, or performing secondary tasks (like texting or adjusting an iPod). When adults face similar situations, their brains can usually process them better because adults have more driving experience.

Inattention, due to secondary activities like texting or to distractions like noisy passengers, is a major cause of crashes among teen drivers. On average, teens are better than adults at managing electronic tasks—not surprising for a generation practically born with video game controllers in hand. However, adults are better at dividing their attention between driving and managing electronic tasks, says Simons-Morton.

In one study, Simons-Morton gave cell phones to adults and novice teen drivers and asked them to dial and obtain some particular information while driving on a test track. When they were within about 200 feet of a traffic signal, the light was turned yellow. All of the adults looked up from their task and stopped at the light, but only two-thirds of the teens did so. “Teens may be good at the tasks themselves, but they’re not good at separating them and keeping their eyes on the road,” Simons-Morton says. “Adults have the experience and wisdom to keep looking back at the road.”

Studies show that teens take more risks behind the wheel when they’re with their friends than when they’re driving alone or with a responsible adult. A 16- or 17-year-old driver’s risk of being in a fatal crash increases with each additional passenger, ultimately quadrupling when carrying three or more passengers younger than 21 (and no older passengers), according to research conducted by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. That’s why teen passenger restrictions are an important component of the graduated driver licensing (GDL) process, which allots responsibility to teen drivers in stages as they gain experience behind the wheel.

Managing the Risk
Crash rates per mile driven for teens are nearly four times higher than for adults, according to the AAA Foundation. And teens are 50 percent more likely to crash in the first month of driving than after a year.

Researchers attribute this to teens’ lack of experience, as well as their inability to divide and shift their attention among tasks and stay focused. To address this situation, traffic-safety experts are creating tools to help teens improve in these areas before they actually get behind the wheel.

Posit Science, a San Francisco company that produces brain-training software, is creating InGear, a computer-based program, in partnership with AAA. Currently in development, it features arcade-style video games to help teens practice skills needed to manage the high cognitive demands of driving. For example, in Andromedus X, the user has to track moving objects in the center of their vision while also monitoring potential hazards in their peripheral vision.

As teens play the video games over and over, neural connections in the prefrontal cortex and other memory areas reorganize so that the brain’s responses to the visual and attention demands of driving become more efficient and automatic.

“Our approach helps people train their brains so they can process information faster and maintain focus on the road—and that makes them safer drivers,” says Peter B. Delahunt, Posit Science’s R & D director. For optimal benefit, teens must spend about 10 hours with the program, but Delahunt notes that brain function can be improved with even just a couple hours’ use.

Another tool, Driver-ZED, an interactive DVD produced by the AAA Foundation, takes teen drivers through realistic scenarios—such as dealing with an aggressive tailgater or encountering a child chasing a ball into the street—that help them develop risk-management skills without the pressure of actually being on the road.

In addition to graduated driver licensing, DVDs, and brain-training software, there’s one more important training tool to consider: parents. “Parents have a vast amount of wisdom they’re probably not even aware of,” Foss says. “They need to pass that wisdom on to their teen. They can do this by driving around with their child as much as possible in a variety of circumstances [e.g., driving at night, on freeways, in bad weather]. That’s how their child will learn.”


teen-brains-422x185Under the Hood

These time-lapse MRI images of human brain development between the ages of 5 and 20 (above) demonstrate how our brains change and mature. The brain develops from back to front. The yellow shading shown in the far left image reflect areas—such as those responsible for making judgments and assessing risk—that are still immature in young teens. These sections begin to fill in as adulthood approaches.

As teens get older, the brain reorganizes information and integrates lessons learned (i.e., experience) into memory; the blue and purple shading represent these developments. In the final image, the frontal lobe, which handles executive functions and cognitive processes such as reasoning and planning, finally matures in young adulthood.


5  Ways to Help Your Teen
If teenagers’ brains are not operating at full capacity, no wonder parents fret about them driving a 3,000-pound machine that can go faster than 100 mph.

Parents can do more than worry every time their teen walks out the door with the car keys. By getting involved, they can help their teen understand the risks and responsibilities of driving. “All teens are not necessarily bad drivers,” says Anita Lorz Villagrana, the Auto Club’s traffic safety manager. “They’re just new drivers who lack experience and are dealing with expected physiological changes.” She offers these tips to help get your teen driver off to a safe start.

1. Be a positive role model. Ninety-five percent of parents believe they’re safe drivers, yet 82 percent of teens report seeing their parents drive carelessly. AAA research shows that teen drivers with collisions and citations often have parents with similar driving records.

2. Assess your child’s readiness to drive. Not all teens are mature and responsible enough to start driving at the age they’re allowed to get their permit. “Also assess if both you and your teen are ready to dedicate the time and effort it takes to practice driving skills,” Villagrana says.

3. Make sure your teen is well rested. Teens need about nine hours of sleep every night. Drowsy driving can be as risky as drunk driving; it affects perception, judgment, and reflexes.

4. Know your state’s GDL law. The Parent–Teen Driving Agreement, available at teendriving.aaa.com, reinforces the GDL law and provides guidelines to discuss with your teen. Agreeing in advance in writing to rules, restrictions, and consequences of driving behavior establishes driving as a privilege—not a right—for your teen.

5. Take advantage of teachable moments. When you’re driving and your teen is a passenger, take time to explain what you’re doing and why. For example, you might say, “It’s raining, so I’m braking earlier in case the road is slick.” Such communication can help prevent crashes, injuries, and fatalities.


Kristen A. Nelson is a writer and consultant based in Washington, D.C.


For information on driving laws, the safest cars for teens, insurance for your teen, plus other resources, go to teendriving.aaa.com. Learn about the Auto Club Driving School in the Teen Driving section of our website and via the Driver-ZED website.


Have a comment about this article?

SEND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Offers, prices, event particulars, contact information, and other details mentioned in this article are time sensitive and subject to change without notice. AAA does not endorse the opinions of the magazine’s columnists or reviewers, nor any products, activities, or companies mentioned unless otherwise explicitly stated.

 

The Teen Brain: Under Construction
New research is revealing why teen drivers behave the way they do
By Kristen A. Nelson
Westways  November/December  2012

More Time to Teach!

Give Yourself More Time To Teach

As this year draws to an end, start a new mind set for how you would like to begin the next year while information is fresh in your head.

Set up Rules and Routines:

Rules and routines keep your class running smoothly so that you have more time for teaching academics. Here are some ideas for establishing, using, and reinforcing rules and routines.

Rules: Rules are just like other instructional activities. They have to be taught, reviewed, and reinforced if they are to be remembered. As we start the year, the teaching of rules and routines is the first activity we should accomplish. Once this has been done, we can begin to teach and will teach more by the end of the year than if we had simply handed out books and started instruction.

Introduce each rule and discuss the variety of behaviors that the rule might include. Reinforce students who are following the rules. Thank them for their consideration. At the elementary level,reinforcement can be done aloud. Upper grade, middle, and high school students can be thanked quietly and privately.

Rules should be both written and taught to students at the beginning of the year. Guidelines for establishing rules are:

• Involve the class in making the rules.

• Keep the rules short and easy to understand.

• Phrase the rules in a positive way.

• Remind the class of the rules at times other than when someone has misbehaved.

• Make different rules for different kinds of activities.

• Key children in to when different rules apply.

• Post the rules and review them periodically.

• If a rule isn’t working, change it.

Routines: Routines refer to specific behaviors and activities that are taught in order to provide smooth,uninterrupted class operation.  Routines, carefully taught, can save large amounts of time during the year. When students know exactly what is expected of them in a variety of situations, the time saved can be spent teaching rather than organizing or disciplining.

Develop, teach, and enforce a specific routine for these basic situations:

  • Passing papers
  • Leaving to go to the restroom
  • Sharpening pencils
  • Heading of papers
  • Getting supplies and books
  • Working in small groups
  • Dismissing the class
  • When assignments are complete
  • Putting away materials
  • Safety routines
  • Taking attendance
  • Administrative Procedures
  • What are students to do while roll, lunch count, and
  • housekeeping items are completed?
  • What are the procedures for students who are tardy,
  • have excuses, or leave early?
  • What are the routines for hall and playground
  • behaviors, e.g., lining up, walking in the halls,
  • passing time, lockers, lunchroom, restrooms?
  • What are the school or district procedures that must
  • be followed?
Adapted from National Education Association’s “I
Can Do It” Classroom Management training module,
developed by California Teachers Association.